IndyMac held its first workshop this Saturday and was overwhelmed by the number of homeowners with delinquent mortgages who attended. The bank had mailed out nearly 4,000 notices to distressed home owners notifying them of the workshop, which it had labeled “Home Preservation Day.”
Organizers assumed 200 people would attend, but were overrun when nearly 2,000 distressed homeowners showed up, according to the Los Angeles Times. Only 300 were able to meet with counselors, and only 100 qualified for loan modifications.
Let’s Do the Math
I’m a big believer in numbers. You can torture them, but they’ll never lie.
- 4,000 Number of IndyMac homeowners who are delinquent on their mortgages
- 2,000 Number of IndyMac homeowners who attended “Home Preservation Day”
- 1,700 Number of attendees who were turned away
- 300 Number of attendees who met with a counselor
- 100 Number of attendees who had their home loan modified
So, What Does This Mean
- 2.5% of the homeowners received loan modifications
- 67.7% of delinquent homeowners failed to qualify for loan modifications
If you extrapolate these trends, 2,667 out of 4,000 IndyMac delinquent homeowners will have their homes foreclosed upon unless the FDIC (which seized control of IndyMac) changes the qualification criteria.
How This Affects You
The IndyMac/FDIC plan is the most likely blueprint for restructuring loans going forward. Two lessons can be learned. First, more than half of homeowners who are facing foreclosure will fail to qualify for loan restructuring.
Second, there is going to be a deluge of homeowners seeking assistance, and the banking industry lacks the infrastructure and resources to process all of the requests.
As a practical matter, you will probably need to spend a fair amount of time fighting through the bureaucracy. Some people are good at that, and have the time and patience.
Your other choices are to work with
- a not-for-profit group
- a paid foreclosure counselor, or
- an attorney.
At this point, the situation is fluid and changing on a weekly basis, so there is no wrong approach.



